Earth Gone Wild – The Best Explanation

There has  been earthquakes, snow storms, hurricanes, tornadoes, and more in places they don’t usually occur; in seasons they don’t usually occur, or with increased frequency and/or greater strength than usual. Many believe it to be natural.  Many believe it to be caused by global warming.  A little knowledge of certain things may change these beliefs.  If you go through all of this information in this article, you will no longer believe in man-made global warming, and you will see how you’re being played for a fool once again.  Please, take a look at what you’re not being told.


*This is more of a source of information than an article.
*In this “article” is enough evidence to disprove man-made global warming beyond a shadow of a doubt.


Here is a little background on something called HAARP.  If you don’t know about it, you will need the information in these videos to understand the proof I will present to show that it is being used today.

HAARP CBC Broadcast Weather control part 2

HAARP (angels don’t play this harp VMIX) Ill Esha & Dewey dB

HAARP Technology

HAARP WEATHER CONTROL could be part of NWO DEPOPULATION PLAN, here’s the science.



Now take a look at this (not the conclusion of “the proof”):

Wichita experiences rare ‘heat burst’ overnight
Temperature at 12:22 AM was 85 degrees. 20 minutes later the temperature peaked to 102 degrees, winds gusted to 40-50 mph, and Dew Points dropped from 60′ to 30′ something he described as going from muggy to desert-like.


Wichita experiences rare ‘heat burst’ overnight

Quote: WICHITA, Kansas — Last night Wichita experienced a very rare weather phenomenon known as a “Heat Burst.” At 12:22 a.m. the temperature at Wichita’s Mid-Continent Airport was 85 degrees. At 12:44 the temperature spiked to 102 degrees. This was a 17 degree increase in only 20 minutes. Winds also gusted between 50 and 60 MPH. The heat burst winds and temperatures rapidly dissipated as they spread across Sedgwick and Southern Butler Counties.

A heat burst is caused when rain falls into very dry air, high up in the atmosphere. The rain quickly evaporates as it falls through the dry parcel of air and that parcel cools rapidly. This dense mass falls rapidly toward the ground, heating up as it compresses. When this hot ball of air hits the ground it spreads out in every direction creating very strong, warm and dry winds.

About an hour before the heat burst, wind gusts up to 40 miles per hour battered the Wichita metro area. This was due to outflow winds from severe weather south of the city, and not related to the heat burst.


Now, check out these parts of this unrelated (to heat burst) documentary on HAARP:

Holes In Heaven: H.A.A.R.P. and Advances inTelsa Technology

10:22 – 11:10 and 34:05 – 34:43
The so-called heat burst!


The Heat Burst according to those news stories:
Caused by rain falling into very dry air, high up in the atmosphere? A heated upper atmosphere?  That just so happens to be exactly what HAARP does. HAARP is also called an ionosphere heater.

What these news people are saying is that the rain turned into steam. How hot would the air have to be in order to turn rain into steam?

An hour before, 40 mph winds battered Wichita? As HAARP heats the upper atmosphere, a layer of the upper atmosphere lifts up, this lifting causes a type of upward pull/suction.


This is the news clip on the story’s webpage:

Wichita experiences rare ‘heat burst’ overnight – KSN TV
The man on the left stated that the wind gusts came first about 10:57 PM and measured 69 mph, then there were some gusts at about 50 mph. He said it was measured at 69 mph. In the article, it states that winds gusted between 50 and 60 MPH. No mention of 69 mph, even though that’s more exciting, which means better news.

His explanation of how a Heat Burst occurs:
“We had storms across the area last night. You have winds that keep those storms aloft, however those storms weakened last night so those winds … they let the storm fall apart. This air, fell out of the sky and hit the ground; it then compressed the air already in place. When you do that, you heat up that air.”

He then goes on to explain how the winds from the storm pushed the hot air across the city. Wow. This would be pretty hard for most to catch if watched on TV at home (with no desire or chance to examine they’re crap, you may not know that it was crap).

How in the world does air that is outside get compressed by air that is outside?  How does air that is   outside stay in place while it’s being compressed by air that is outside, and then do so in a way that it get’s heated to a super hot temperature???  These people are lying to you.



More HAARP Related Info

Quote: Others are engaging even in an eco- type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves. So there are plenty of ingenious minds out there that are at work finding ways in which they can wreak terror upon other nations. It’s real, and that’s the reason why we have to intensify our efforts, and that’s why this is so important.


Quote: HAARP is a research project using using a ground based apparatus, an array of antennae each powered by its own transmitter, to heat up portions of ionosphere with powerful radio beams.(23) The energy generated heats up parts of the ionosphere; this results in holes in the ionosphere and produces artificial ‘lenses’.

HAARP can be used for many purposes. Enormous quantities of energy can be controlled by manipulating the electrical characteristics of the atmosphere. If used as a military weapon this can have a devastating impact on an enemy. HAARP can deliver millions of times more energy to a given area than any other conventional transmitter. The energy can also be aimed at a moving target which should constitute a potential anti-missile system.

The project would also allow better communications with submarines and manipulation of global weather patterns, but it is also possible to do the reverse, to disrupt communications. By manipulating the ionosphere one could block global communications while transmitting one’s own. Another application is earth-penetrating, tomography, x-raying the earth several kilometres deep, to detect oil and gas fields, or underground military facilities. Over-the-horizon radar is another application, looking round the curvature of the earth for in-coming objects.

From the 1950s the USA conducted explosions of nuclear material in the Van Allen Belts(24) to investigate the effect of the electro-magnetic pulse generated by nuclear weapon explosions at these heights on radio communications and the operation of radar. This created new magnetic radiation belts which covered nearly the whole earth. The electrons travelled along magnetic lines of force and created an artificial Aurora Borealis above the North Pole. These military tests are liable to disrupt the Van Allen belt for a long period. The earth’s magnetic field could be disrupted over large areas, which would obstruct radio communications. According to US scientists it could take hundreds of years for the Van Allen belt to return to normal. HAARP could result in changes in weather patterns. It could also influence whole ecosystems, especially in the sensitive Antarctic regions.

Another damaging consequence of HAARP is the occurrence of holes in the ionosphere caused by the powerful radio beams. The ionosphere protects us from incoming cosmic radiation. The hope is that the holes will fill again, but our experience of change in the ozone layer points in the other direction. This means substantial holes in the ionosphere that protects us.


30 mins before the 2008 Sichuan earthquake in China
What do most of these earthquakes have in common: Aurora Borealis in the atmosphere (something that doesn’t occur in those regions), and a heated atmosphere right before the earthquake. What does HAARP cause, those very things, along with earthquakes.
More on HAARP

Holes In Heaven: H.A.A.R.P.
15:26 — 15:18 — even causes global warming
16:18 — 19:25 — earth penetrating tomography/x-ray/sonar
19:24 — 24:56 — effects on humans
24:56 — 31:33 — use as a weapon
31:33 — 36:51 – weather manipulation


Angels Still Don’t Play This HAARP


Conspiracy Theory W/ Jesse Ventura: HAARP [Season 1, Episode 1]

Please watch the whole thing, even if you get to a part you don’t agree with.
The thing about this show is that it is on television. The only way you can present info such as this on TV is to make it into a “conspiracy” show. The term “conspiracy theory” is a trigger word, so to use it in the title of the show is to discredit it to most Americans from the start.
Don’t pay attention to the made-for-TV portions of the show (sounds, music, voice, etc), just take the info.  “… by heating up the atmosphere, you could move the jet-stream …”


Chavez: US weapon test caused Haiti earthquake

Quote: The U.S., however, has exploited the earthquake to send the military to the stricken island nation. “They brazenly occupied Haiti without consulting the UN or the OAS (Organization of American States),” said Chavez earlier in the week. Bolivian President Evo Morales said Wednesday he would request an emergency UN meeting “to repudiate and reject this military occupation of the United States in Haiti.”

“It’s not right the United States should use this natural disaster to invade and militarily occupy Haiti,” he told a press conference.

“The unspoken mission of US Southern Command (SOUTHCOM) with headquarters in Miami and US military installations throughout Latin America is to ensure the maintenance of subservient national regimes, namely US proxy governments, committed to the Washington Consensus and the neoliberal policy agenda,” writes Michel Chossudovsky. “While US military personnel will at the outset be actively involved in emergency and disaster relief, this renewed US military presence in Haiti will be used to establish a foothold in the country as well pursue America’s strategic and geopolitical objectives in the Caribbean basin, which are largely directed against Cuba and Venezuela.”


A Haiti Disaster Relief Scenario Was Envisaged by the US Military One Day Before the Earthquake

Quote: A Haiti disaster relief scenario had been envisaged at the headquarters of US Southern Command SOUTHCOM in Miami one day prior to the earthquake.

The holding of pre-disaster simulations pertained to the impacts of a hurricane in Haiti. They were held on January 10. (Bob Brewin,Defense launches online system to coordinate Haiti relief efforts (1/15/10) —, complete text of article is contained in Annex)

The Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA), which is under the jurisdiction of the Department of Defense (DoD), was involved in organizing these scenarios on behalf of US Southern Command.(SOUTHCOM).”


When it came to Haiti, the US did a “Hurricane Katrina,” but hardly anyone in the US knows this. What do I mean? The information on the mainstream media was a lie. At the same time the news said there was violence, I was watching Amy Goodman on Democracy Now and she was WALKING AROUND Haiti going from town to town. Guess what? No violence. While the US news said they were sending in aid, I was watching Hatians say they weren’t being helped and aid was being diverted. You don’t believe me? Here is all of what I just mentioned and more:
All this manipulated weather that is going on is in part a plan to energize the false belief of “the end of the world” which resides in the minds of people. This in turn will increase the people’s fear and paranoia, which when added to other fear and paranoia, will cause people to react as desired (examples: desire a chip, being housed in a fancy concentration camp, or rule by a “wise” men instead of governments).


Weather control is not something new, it’s just never mentioned (like many other discoveries and advances). The information in this documentary proves it:

Owning The Weather


Weather modification:



Strange Weather Due to Global Warming, and Global Warming Due To Man-Made CO2?

This is the type of information they give the public:

Hurricane Irene, Unusual Earthquakes, Unprecedented Tornadoes, Historic Flooding And Horrific Drought: Why Is All Of This Stuff Happening To America?


Al Gore’s documentary: An Inconvenient Truth (2006)

Al Gore
Quote: Was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, sharing the prize with the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Had he been the actual recipient of an Academy Award for the documentary An Inconvenient Truth (2006) in which he starred, he would have become the first person other than George Bernard Shaw to win both a Nobel Prize and an Oscar. [2007]

Many people were in disbelief at his win, and they had reason to be. This documentary wasn’t even packed with knowledge. If you listen closely, you will hear “untrues” and “unfoundeds” alongside visual and audio that is designed to attack certain emotions and beliefs.

Nobel Peace Prize? Sounds “Barackish” (Barrack winning the nobel peace prize for war). Wins like his and Barrack’s show that very power people, those above governments, are trying to accomplish something.


Global warming, Climate change, or Man-made global warming: There may be climate change, and it may be warming, but man-made is something that is being hyped up. People in high positions got caught lying about man-made global warming (look up “Climategate”) that’s why the talks slowed down for a while. They have a scheme, a carbon tax, that they’re trying to put in place, so they’ve been trying to convince the public that man-made global warming is occurring and we’re all in danger. It’s the same Problem > Reaction > Solution.



These documentaries can shed some light on the lies:

Global Warming or Global Governance – Full version


The great global warming swindle – Full version
6:50 – 10:00 — present warming trend, Little Ice Age, Medieval Warm Period, Holocene Maximum (another warm period, which was warmer than it is today)
10:00 – 13:20 — Is industrial growth and CO2 the cause, the temperature record, NASA chart, warming began before cars and planes were invented, as production increased, the temp decreased
13:20 – 18:25 — CO2, greenhouse gas, the greenhouse effect, study of surface warming and upper atmosphere warming
18:26 – 21:57 — Al Gore, the link between CO2 and temperature, temperature leading CO2
21:57 – 25:37 — CO2, the ocean
25:42 – 29:50 — the sun, sunspots, sunspots and temperature
29:50 – 31:52 — the sun and clouds, clouds and the earth’s climate
31:52 – 33:47 — the sun is the driver
33:47 – 44:45 — the global warming theory
44:47 – 49:13 — global warming computer models
49:13 – 54:42 — the media, melting ice
54:42 – 101:49 — climate change rumors, IPCC, research funding
101:49 – END — the global warming movement, the precautionary principle, developing nations


Chemtrails , first int. Symposium Belgium 15 of 21

Chemtrails , first int. Symposium Belgium 16 of 21

Chemtrails , first int. Symposium Belgium 17 of 21


Watch these videos. Each video has very important information, so don’t skip over anything. For these first 5, take the info, ignore the drama which is added to the TV show. It’s important that you watch all….

The Truth About Climate Change P 1 of 9

The Truth About Climate Change P 2 of 9

The Truth About Climate Change P 3 of 9

The Truth About Climate Change P 4 of 9

The Truth About Climate Change P 5 of 9

The Truth About Climate Change P 6 of 9
(clip from “Fall of the Republic”)

The Truth About Climate Change P 7 of 9
(clip from “Fall of the Republic”)

The Truth About Climate Change P 8 of 9
(clip from “Fall of the Republic”)

The Truth About Climate Change P 9 of 9
(“Climategate” emails)
The “clouds” chemtrails produce (chemtrails: magnify the light, and therefor heat, of the sun when they come between the sun and the earth (they act as a magnifying glass).  This results in the earth being heated.  You don’t believe me?  Test it yourself.  On a partly cloudy day, preferably a day with fake clouds in the sky, stay still and note the level of heat you feel from direct exposure to the sun’s rays, then stay in place until a “cloud” moves in front of the sun.  You will feel an increase in heat.  Recall many years ago when a could would pass in front of the sun, you would ALWAYS feel a decrease in heat; some days you would even want the cloud to move in order to feel the sun’s heat again (in order to warm yourself).

With those in power being able to create earthquakes and all types of weather, while at the same time desiring citizens to believe in man-made global warming, and even lying to convince them of this, it is highly probable that they are intentionally causing strange and intense weather and earthquakes, even heating the earth, so the public will see it as proof of man-made global warming and accept the global carbon tax.

Another thing to consider: They have knowledge of natural occurrences that are due to take place, but will not share all that they know. From this knowledge, they can play off the occurrences. One, for instance, is the sun and it’s sun spots, which those documentaries show to be the true cause of global warming.



APNewsbreak: Future holds more extreme weather

Tuesday, November 1, 2011
Quote: WASHINGTON (AP) – For a world already weary of weather catastrophes, the latest warning from top climate scientists paints a grim future: More floods, more heat waves, more droughts and greater costs to deal with them.
A draft summary of an international scientific report obtained by The Associated Press says the extremes caused by global warming could eventually grow so severe that some locations become “increasingly marginal as places to live.”
The report from the Nobel Prize-winning Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change marks a change in climate science, from focusing on subtle shifts in average temperatures to concentrating on the harder-to-analyze freak events that grab headlines, hurt economies and kill people.
“The extremes are a really noticeable aspect of climate change,” said Jerry Meehl, senior scientist at the National Center for Atmospheric Research. “I think people realize that the extremes are where we are going to see a lot of the impacts of climate change.”
The final version of the report from a panel of leading climate scientists will be issued in a few weeks, after a meeting in Uganda. The draft says there is at least a 2-in-3 probability that climate extremes have already worsened because of man-made greenhouse gases.
The most recent bizarre weather extreme, the pre-Halloween snowstorm that crippled parts of the Northeast last weekend, cannot be blamed on climate change and probably isn’t the type of storm that will increase with global warming, according to four meteorologists and climate scientists.
Climategate stopped them in their tracks, but now that they have outrageous weather on their side (much of which is man-made, but not believed to be man-made by citizens), they can move forward. They can pull this off if they want to. And if they want to pull it off this way, there will be a combination of weird weather along with talks of global warming from the media.


Rothschild Australia and E3 International to take the lead in the global carbon trading market

PR Newswire
Friday, March 20, 2009


Rothschild Australia and E3 International to take the lead in the global carbon trading market


Australia passes controversial carbon pollution tax

By Amy Coopes (AFP)
November 7, 2011
Quote: Australia passed its controversial pollution tax Tuesday in a sweeping and historic reform aimed at lowering carbon emissions blamed for climate change, after years of fierce debate.
Cheers and applause broke out as the Senate approved the Clean Energy Act by 36 votes to 32, requiring Australia’s coal-fired power stations and other major emitters to “pay to pollute” from July 1 next year.
Prime Minister Julia Gillard said it was the culmination of a “quarter of a century of scientific warnings, 37 parliamentary inquiries and years of bitter debate and division.”
“Today Australia has a price on carbon as the law of our land,” she said.
“Today we have made history — after all of these days of debate and division, our nation has got the job done.”
Gillard said the scheme — which will levy a price of Aus$23 (US$23.80) per tonne on carbon pollution before moving to an emissions trading scheme in 2015 — would begin to address “the devastating impacts of climate change”.
Australia was hit by floods and cyclones earlier this year, a cruel twist for areas which have just emerged from epic drought, and scientists have warned climate change will likely make extreme weather events more frequent.
The timing of the vote is significant, representing a firm commitment ahead of high-level UN climate talks in South Africa later this month that are being called a “make or break” meeting for legally binding carbon emission reduction targets.
In case they move or remove the article:
Speaking about Monsanto’s RBGH, the reporter in this clip (portion of the documentary The Corporation) states how she “didn’t realize how effectively a corporation could work to get something on the marketplace … the levels of coordination they had to have … they had to get university professors into the fold, they had to get experts into the fold, they had to get reporters into the fold, they had to get the public into the fold, and of course the FDA, let’s not leave them out.” Source:
Here, in this case, of a hormone being injecting into cows, one corporation was able to get university professors, experts, reporters, the federal regulators, and the public. And it was done. And this sort of thing is always done. So, to think that widely shared beliefs with accompanied “evidence” cannot be a fraud/lie/conspiracy because so many people believe, and so many important people say so, including experts, is to think wrong.

Corporations have always done this. Corporations have more power than the US government (they pay them, and later employ them, and even are them). All these decades of extreme protest against their polluting; all these decades of the government allowing them to pollute for brides; and now all of a sudden the government is punishing them?


Climate Change Research Group to Receive Big Oil Funding

Quote: A major U.S. climate study group has announced it will begin accepting money from big oil companies and other large corporations after losing most of its funding. The Center for Climate and Energy Solutions was formerly known as the Pew Center on Global Climate Change until the Pew Charitable Trusts withdrew its financing for 80 percent of the group’s $4.4 million budget. The new Center will be funded by companies including Shell, General Electric, Duke Energy, Bank of America and others.

This is an awkward situation, especially with Arco’s natural gas powering HAARP in Alaska. Why are such big players backing this group. I wonder who all the companies are.
On their site:
Quote: Published in three parts in June 2011, these articles by science journalist John Carey provide insights and eye-witness accounts of recent record-breaking weather events and the link to climate change, the science behind it all, and what can be done to manage the growing risks.

The link they provide to the article:


Storm Warnings: Extreme Weather Is a Product of Climate Change

By John Carey | June 28, 2011
Quote: More violent and frequent storms, once merely a prediction of climate models, are now a matter of observation. Part 1 of a three-part series
So are the floods and spate of other recent extreme events also examples of predictions turned into cold, hard reality? Increasingly, the answer is yes. Scientists used to say, cautiously, that extreme weather events were “consistent” with the predictions of climate change. No more. “Now we can make the statement that particular events would not have happened the same way without global warming,” says Kevin Trenberth, head of climate analysis at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) in Boulder, Colo.

First of all, as usual, they say “scientists” as if all scientists believe and say so. There are many who say the opposite (but they make sure you don’t hear those). This same deceit was used with intelligent design, vaccines, and more (the public just doesn’t know it). Scientists who disagree with the majority are ignored and even banned from the greater group.

“Consistent with predictions” = consistent with what others said would happen = no actual proof.

Quote: “Our figures indicate a trend towards an increase in extreme weather events that can only be fully explained by climate change,” says Peter Höppe, head of Munich Re’s Geo Risks Research/Corporate Climate Center: “It’s as if the weather machine had changed up a gear.”

That’s a good way to put it.

The propaganda on global warming is so good hardly anyone realizes there’s only proof  the earth is warming – the same thing it has done in the past. Proof that man-made CO2 is causing warming? Nope. Proof the extreme weather is due to global warming caused by man-made CO2? Nope.

They have no proof of their claims, whereas with HAARP, signatures are left: Heated upper atmospheres before events. Aurora Borealis in parts of the world where it has never before occurred suddenly appearing in the sky right before earthquakes. These are things that HAARP does. Actual proof/evidence/link, compared to no proof/evidence/link.

He states that the increase in extreme weather was like the planet’s natural weather system/machine –that which creates and causes weather– had changed up a gear/been made more active. That’s exactly the same as saying that the increase in extreme weather is like an unnatural weather machine being made more active. And yet he states that it can only be fully explained by climate change???????

Do you realize that even if all scientists in the world are in agreement, it still doesn’t mean that what they agree upon is the truth/true. If all say the earth is flat, and one says it is round, the one saying it is round will be attacked and thought of as a heretic. They are in a gang, and they have a gang mentality. They speak on their theories as facts/the truth, with society taking them as facts/the truth. They are bought and controlled just like everything else in this country. Their jobs (income) are supplied by corporations of the ruling elite. Most of the scientific community is a joke, but the American people haven’t figured this out yet.
The truth in America is based solely on who said it and how many believe it, not if what was said is the truth.
Intelligent design is another issue which shows how the scientific community really works (paid and scared into deceiving).

To support my statement:

expelled no intelligence allowed (part 1of10)
You would have to watch the whole thing in order to understand my statement, and see how the public constantly being lied to.
So, with man-made global warming being a lie, what’s causing most of these abnormal occurrences?  The evidence points to HAARP.


The truth will out on Labor’s carbon scam

Miranda Devine
The Daily Telegraph
November 17, 2011
Quote: THE whitewash begins. Now that the carbon tax has passed through federal parliament, the government’s clean-up brigade is getting into the swing by trying to erase any dissent against the jobs-destroying legislation.
On cue comes the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, which this week issued warnings to businesses that they will face whopping fines of up to $1.1m if they blame the carbon tax for price rises.
It says it has been “directed by the Australian government to undertake a compliance and enforcement role in relation to claims made about the impact of a carbon price.”
Businesses are not even allowed to throw special carbon tax sales promotions before the tax arrives on July 1.
“Beat the Carbon Tax – Buy Now” or “Buy now before the carbon tax bites” are sales pitches that are verboten. Or at least, as the ACCC puts it, “you should be very cautious about making these types of claims”.

There will be 23 carbon cops roaming the streets doing snap audits of businesses that “choose to link your price increases to a carbon price”.
Instead, the ACCC suggests you tell customers you’ve raised prices because “the overall cost of running (your) business has increased”.
It’s all very Orwellian: the tax whose name cannot be spoken. We are already paying for the climate-change hysteria that has gripped Australia for a decade. Replacing even a portion of our cheap, coal-fired power with renewable energy is hellishly expensive. It also requires costly adaptation of existing infrastructure.
That’s a big reason why electricity prices have hit the roof already. So when we accelerate the process with the carbon tax, the pain will escalate. That’s the whole point of carbon pricing. A record number of households have had their electricity disconnected because they can’t pay their power bills.
Household energy costs are estimated to have risen 17 per cent since July, with the result that the ranks of the energy poor are swelling.
In NSW, the Energy and Water Ombudsman has reported an 18 per cent increase in complaints from people whose electricity has been disconnected.
Then there are all the little immeasurables. For instance, last winter the price of Lebanese cucumbers in NSW skyrocketed because soaring energy costs forced the biggest grower to shut off heat lamps in some of his growing sheds. Result: fewer cucumbers – so prices rose to meet demand.
But no matter how Orwellian the tactics, no matter how many carbon cops are sent into hairdressing salons to interrogate barbers on the precise nature of their price rises, the truth remains: Australia has gone out on a limb, imposing a carbon tax that will send businesses to the wall, cause undue hardship to families, and tether Australians more tightly to government handouts.
And soon, we will send billions of dollars overseas to buy useless pieces of paper called carbon credits. Invest-ment bankers, lawyers and carbon traders will get rich, as will all the usual spivs and scam artists ready to stick a bucket under the government spigot raining taxpayer cash.
It doesn’t matter how many fairy stories the Greens tell about how the carbon tax will “save” the Great Barrier Reef and Kakadu. Or how many gullible people believe hurricanes, floods and earthquakes are the result of man-made global warming. Eventually, the truth will out.
Even the International Panel on Climate Change, whose bureaucrat-written summaries cherrypick the most alarming scientific forecasts, is holding back in the face of runaway alarmist rhetoric from politicians.
In fact, leaked draft copies of the IPCC’s latest special report into “Extreme Events and Disasters” reveal declining scientific certainty about the threat of human-produced greenhouse gases.
“There are a lot more unknowns than knowns,” says BBC environment correspondent Richard Black.
The rising toll of extreme weather events cannot be blamed on greenhouse gas emissions, according to Black, who has seen the draft.
“Uncertainty in the sign of projected changes in climate extremes over the coming two to three decades is relatively large because climate change signals are expected to be relatively small compared to natural climate variability,” says the IPCC report. In other words, the effect of human-produced greenhouse gas on the climate is insignificant when compared to natural climate change.
Since he’s dropped in for 26 hours, US President Barack Obama could explain to his new best friend Julia Gillard why he decided not to impose a carbon tax on his ailing economy. Or why Canada has prudently ruled out a carbon scheme, and New Zealand is scaling its back and China and India continue to sit on their hands. Durban will be fun.



Uh oh, global warming loons: here comes Climategate II!

By James Delingpole Politics Last updated: November 22nd, 2011

Quote: Breaking news: two years after the Climategate, a further batch of emails has been leaked onto the internet by a person – or persons – unknown. And as before, they show the “scientists” at the heart of the Man-Made Global Warming industry in a most unflattering light. Michael Mann, Phil Jones, Ben Santer, Tom Wigley, Kevin Trenberth, Keith Briffa – all your favourite Climategate characters are here, once again caught red-handed in a series of emails exaggerating the extent of Anthropogenic Global Warming, while privately admitting to one another that the evidence is nowhere near as a strong as they’d like it to be.
In other words, what these emails confirm is that the great man-made global warming scare is not about science but about political activism. This, it seems, is what motivated the whistleblower ‘FOIA 2011’ (or “thief”, as the usual suspects at RealClimate will no doubt prefer to tar him or her) to go public.
As FOIA 2011 puts it when introducing the selected highlights, culled from a file of 220,000 emails:

“Over 2.5 billion people live on less than $2 a day.”
“Every day nearly 16.000 children die from hunger and related causes.”
“One dollar can save a life” — the opposite must also be true.
“Poverty is a death sentence.”
“Nations must invest $37 trillion in energy technologies by 2030 to stabilize
greenhouse gas emissions at sustainable levels.”
Today’s decisions should be based on all the information we can get, not on
hiding the decline.
FOIA 2011 is right, of course. If you’re going to bomb the global economy back to the dark ages with environmental tax and regulation, if you’re going to favour costly, landscape-blighting, inefficient renewables over real, abundant, relatively cheap energy that works like shale gas and oil, if you’re going to cause food riots and starvation in the developing world by giving over farmland (and rainforests) to biofuel production, then at the very least you it owe to the world to base your policies on sound, transparent, evidence-based science rather than on the politicised, disingenuous junk churned out by the charlatans at the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
You’ll find the full taster menu of delights here at Tall Bloke’s website. Shrub Niggurath is on the case too. As is the Air Vent.
I particularly like the ones expressing deep reservations about the narrative put about by the IPCC:

/// The IPCC Process ///
<1939> Thorne/MetO:
Observations do not show rising temperatures throughout the tropical
troposphere unless you accept one single study and approach and discount a
wealth of others. This is just downright dangerous. We need to communicate the
uncertainty and be honest. Phil, hopefully we can find time to discuss these
further if necessary […]
<3066> Thorne:
I also think the science is being manipulated to put a political spin on it
which for all our sakes might not be too clever in the long run.
<1611> Carter:
It seems that a few people have a very strong say, and no matter how much
talking goes on beforehand, the big decisions are made at the eleventh hour by
a select core group.
<2884> Wigley:
Mike, The Figure you sent is very deceptive […] there have been a number of
dishonest presentations of model results by individual authors and by IPCC […]
<4755> Overpeck:
The trick may be to decide on the main message and use that to guid[e] what’s
included and what is left out.
<3456> Overpeck:
I agree w/ Susan [Solomon] that we should try to put more in the bullet about
“Subsequent evidence” […] Need to convince readers that there really has been
an increase in knowledge – more evidence. What is it?
And here’s our friend Phil Jones, apparently trying to stuff the IPCC working groups with scientists favourable to his cause, while shutting out dissenting voices.

<0714> Jones:
Getting people we know and trust [into IPCC] is vital – hence my comment about
the tornadoes group.
<3205> Jones:
Useful ones [for IPCC] might be Baldwin, Benestad (written on the solar/cloud
issue – on the right side, i.e anti-Svensmark), Bohm, Brown, Christy (will be
have to involve him ?)
Here is what looks like an outrageous case of government – the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs – actually putting pressure on climate “scientists” to talk up their message of doom and gloom in order to help the government justify its swingeing climate policies:

<2495> Humphrey/DEFRA:
I can’t overstate the HUGE amount of political interest in the project as a
message that the Government can give on climate change to help them tell their
story. They want the story to be a very strong one and don’t want to be made
to look foolish.
Here is a gloriously revealing string of emails in which activists and global warming research groups discuss how best to manipulate reality so that climate change looks more scary and dangerous than it really is:

<3655> Singer/WWF:
we as an NGO working on climate policy need such a document pretty soon for the
public and for informed decision makers in order to get a) a debate started and
b) in order to get into the media the context between climate
extremes/desasters/costs and finally the link between weather extremes and
<0445> Torok/CSIRO:
[…] idea of looking at the implications of climate change for what he termed
“global icons” […] One of these suggested icons was the Great Barrier Reef […]
It also became apparent that there was always a local “reason” for the
destruction – cyclones, starfish, fertilizers […] A perception of an
“unchanging” environment leads people to generate local explanations for coral
loss based on transient phenomena, while not acknowledging the possibility of
systematic damage from long-term climatic/environmental change […] Such a
project could do a lot to raise awareness of threats to the reef from climate
<4141> Minns/Tyndall Centre:
In my experience, global warming freezing is already a bit of a public
relations problem with the media
I agree with Nick that climate change might be a better labelling than global
What kind of circulation change could lock Europe into deadly summer heat waves
like that of last summer? That’s the sort of thing we need to think about.
I’ll have a deeper dig through the emails this afternoon and see what else I come up with. If I were a climate activist off to COP 17 in Durban later this month, I don’t think I’d be feeling a very happy little drowning Polie, right now. In fact I might be inclined to think that the game was well and truly up.


Climategate II: More Smoking Guns From The Global Warming Establishment

Quote: A new release of incriminating e-mail exchanges between leading climate scientists that is now being termed “Climategate II” actually represents but another episode in a continuing scandal that has been taking place for decades. This fraud of massive scope and consequence has served as the basis for arguably the greatest regulatory overreach of all time.
It has been used to justify the EPA’s demands that restrict carbon dioxide and other “greenhouse gas” emissions from stationary sources they attribute to causing climate change. Included are electrical power generation facilities, iron and steel mills, pulp and paper mills, cement production, and the construction industry.
The EPA’s “Endangerment Finding” applied to support these actions was based upon politically-manipulated human-caused climate warming conclusions issued by the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) that were even at odds with findings of its own internal study on the matter. That EPA report stated “given the downward trend in temperatures since 1998 (which some think will continue until at least 2030), there is no particular reason to rush into decisions based upon a scientific hypothesis that does not appear to explain most of the available data.”
As if the first round of e-mails purloined from the U.K.’s East Anglia University Climate Research Unit (CRU) network weren’t damning enough, the new batch of about 5,000 more obtained through an anonymous source identified as “FOIA” are truly stunning. Many clearly confirm that top IPCC scientists consciously misrepresented and actively withheld important information…then attempted to prevent discovery. Included are CRU’s Director of Research, Phil Jones, the U.S. National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) climate’s analysis section head, Kevin Trenberth; and beleaguered Penn State University “hockey stick” originator, Michael Mann.
“If there were any doubts remaining after reading the first Climategate e-mails, the new batch of e-mails that appeared on the web today [November 22] make it clear that the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change is an organized conspiracy dedicated to tricking the world into believing that global warming is a crisis that requires a drastic response,” said Myron Ebell, Director of the Competitive Enterprise Institute’s Center on Energy and Environment. “Several of the new e-mails show that the scientists involved in doctoring the IPCC reports are very aware that the energy-rationing policies that their junk science is meant to support would cost trillions of dollars.”
Phil Jones, who served as a lead author for one of the key chapters in IPCC’s Fourth Assessment Report (2007), leaves no doubt of intentions to keep embarrassing and conspiratorial disclosures under tight wraps:
I’ve been told that IPCC is above national FOI Acts. One way to cover yourself and all those working on AR5 would be to delete all e-mails at the end of the process. Any work we have done in the past is done on the back of the research grants we get – and has to be well hidden. I’ve discussed this with the main funder (U.S. Department of Energy) in the past and they are happy about not releasing the original station data.
In another e-mail Jones admits that the climate models alarmist claims have been built upon can’t be trusted: “Basic problem is that all models are wrong – not got enough middle and low level clouds. …what he [Zwiers] has done comes to a different conclusion than Caspar and Gene! I reckon this can be saved by careful wording.”
Additional Links:  (the emails)



“The threat of environmental crisis will be the international disaster key that will unlock the new world order.”  Mikhail Gorbachev



Creative Commons License
Earth Gone Wild – The Best Explanation by Writeous1 is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.

1 Comment

  1. Writeous1 (Post author)

    Arctic Sea Ice Melts to Lowest Point as “Worst-Case Scenario” Appears Real

    What effect does sunlight shining through chemtrails over a period of years have on the surface temperature of the ice?

    What effect does causing droughts by HAARP have on the ice?

Leave a Comment